CFD Study of Effects of Geometry Variations on Flow in a Nozzle
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes simulations have been performed to investigate the effect of nozzle geometry on the turbulence characteristics of incompressible fluid flow through nozzles at Reynolds number of approximately 50,000. Four nozzles have been considered: a baseline nozzle and three modified nozzles (extended, grooved and ringed). The flow in these nozzles has been simulated using different turbulence closure models, including Spalart-Allmaras, variants of k - ε and k - ω, and the Reynolds Stress Model (RSM). By comparison to experimental data, it is shown that the RSM produces more accurate results for the prediction of turbulent fluctuations. The presence of a ring significantly increases both the turbulence intensity and mean velocity at the exit, and requires a much higher inlet pressure to move the fluid through the nozzle. On the other hand, cutting a groove near the exit or extending the nozzle has little effect on the exit flow characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it