Analysis of Shear-Critical Reinforced Concrete Plane Frame Elements under Cyclic Loading
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An analytical procedure was recently developed for the nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete frame structures consisting of beams, columns, and shear walls under monotonic loading. The procedure is distinct from others because it is capable of inherently and accurately considering shear effects and significant second-order mechanisms with a simple modeling process suitable for use in practice. In this study, the procedure is further developed to enable the performance assessment of shear-critical frame structures under general (arbitrary) loading, including the special cases of cyclic and reversed-cyclic loads. Newly developed and implemented formulations are described and applied to 11 previously tested specimens for verification. Important considerations in nonlinear modeling and the limitations of the procedure are also discussed. The procedure is found to accurately simulate the overall experimental behaviors of the specimens examined. Performance measures, such as load and deformation capacities, stiffnesses, energy dissipations, ductilities, failure modes, crack widths, and reinforcement strains, are typically captured well. The procedure exhibits excellent convergence and numerical stability, requiring little computational time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it