MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

New diseases of <i>Trillium</i> in the UK caused by <i>Colletotrichum lineola</i> and <i>Urocystis trillii</i>

2010· article· en· W2047503433 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B. Henricot

Bibliographic record

VenueNew Disease Reports · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyBotanyHerbariumConidiumSetaPycnidiumPetalGenus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trillium species consist of temperate-forest herbs and are native to North America and Asia (Case & Case, 1997). They are spring-flowering perennials with three sepals and three petals. In the UK, they are specialist grown plants suitable for the woodland garden. In May 2005, Trillium erectum f. albiflorum diseased plants originating from a nursery in Hampshire were received at the Royal Horticultural Society. Symptoms included pale brown lesions on the stems and leaves in which dark setae were visible (Fig. 1). Conidia of the fungus were hyaline, aseptate with an acute apex and truncate base and measured 21-29 times 2.9-1.6 μm (Fig. 2). Setae were usually one-septate at the base, brown and measured 123-400 μm (Fig. 3). The morphological characteristics fitted a Colletrotrichum species. As there is a high variability of the morphological features in Colletotrichum, the identification was achieved by sequencing of the ITS and the histone3 (HIS3) regions (Damm et al., 2009). The ITS and HIS3 regions were amplified using ITS1/ITS 4 primers (White et al., 1990) and CYLH3F/CYLH3R primers (Crous et al., 2004) respectively and sequenced (GenBank Accession Nos. HQ239359, HQ239360). Although the ITS sequence was identical to Colletotrichum dematium and C. linolea, the H3 sequence differentiated both species and confirmed the identity as C. lineola. An herbarium sample was deposited at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (K(M)164723). The fungus was isolated on PDA and sporulated after two weeks at 20°C under a 16 h photoperiod. To fulfil Koch's postulates, Trillium grandiflorum plants were dipped in a suspension of ~ 2 times 106 spores/ml and covered with a plastic bag for 48 hrs to maintain a high humidity. The plants were left outside where the temperature ranged from 12° to 25°C. After two months the plants collapsed and the fungus was re-isolated from the inoculated tissues. Control plants were water-inoculated and remained healthy. In June 2010, Trillium kurabayashii plants originating from Norfolk were received at the RHS showing typical symptoms of a smut disease (Figs. 4A & B). Sori exposing black spore masses were observed mainly on stems sometimes spreading to the base of leaves. The sori were large and confluent with individual sori reaching 3.5 cm in length. Ellipsoid, ovoid brown spore balls measured 29-42 times 29-58 μm and were surrounded by a layer of hyaline sterile cells measuring 8-12 times 5-9 μm. The spores were chestnut-brown ovoid or polyhedral and measured 14-23 times 11-17 μm (Fig. 5). The morphological characteristics fit the description of the smut fungus Urocystis trillii (Jackson, 1920). An herbarium sample was deposited at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (K(M)166157). The ITS region was sequenced as above (GenBank Accession No HQ239361) and was unique when compared to other sequences in GenBank. Colletotrichum lineola is a widespread pathogen affecting a wide range of plant species in temperate regions. The only occurrence of the fungus on Trillium was reported from the USA (Farr & Rossman, 2010). Urocystis trillii is a rarely reported smut specific to Trillium that occurs in Canada, Japan and Western North America (Farr et al., 2010). This is the first case of the disease in the UK or indeed Europe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew Disease ReportsSame topicPlant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesFrench-language works237,207