Synaptic circuits of the <i>Drosophila</i> optic lobe: The input terminals to the medulla
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the visual pathways of the fly's compound eye has been blocked for decades at the second optic neuropil, the medulla, a two-part relay comprising 10 strata (M1-M10), and the largest neuropil in the fly's brain. Based on the modularity of its composition, and two previous reports, on Golgi-impregnated cell types (Fischbach and Dittrich, Cell Tissue Res.,1989; 258:441-475) and their synaptic circuits in the first neuropil, the lamina, we used serial-section electron microscopy to examine inputs to the distal strata M1-M6. We report the morphology of the reconstructed medulla terminals of five lamina cells, L1-L5, two photoreceptors, R7 and R8, and three neurons, medulla cell T1 and centrifugal cells C2 and C3. The morphology of these conforms closely to previous reports from Golgi impregnation. This fidelity provides assurance that our reconstructions are complete and accurate. Synapses of these terminals broadly localize to the terminal and provide contacts to unidentified targets, mostly medulla cells, as well as sites of connection between the terminals themselves. These reveal that R8 forms contacts upon R7 and thus between these two spectral inputs; that L3 provides input upon both pathways, adding an achromatic input; that the terminal of L5 reciprocally connects to that of L1, thus being synaptic in the medulla despite lacking synapses in the lamina; that the motion-sensing input cells L1 and L2 lack direct interconnection but both receive input from C2 and C3, resembling lamina connections of these cells; and that, as in the lamina, T1 provides no output chemical synapses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it