MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047581924 · doi:10.2118/0208-0028-jpt

Coiled Tubing "Vacuum" Restores North Slope Wells

2008· article· en· W2047581924 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
JPT staff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNozzleAnnulus (botany)InjectorCoiled tubingCasingPetroleum engineeringHydraulic fracturingDiffuser (optics)WellboreGeologyPressure dropCompletion (oil and gas wells)Oil wellArtificial liftGeotechnical engineeringMechanicsMaterials scienceEngineeringMechanical engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Technology Update The North Slope of Alaska is home to thousands of oil wells, most drilled horizontally and then stimulated with hydraulic fracturing or allowed to flow through natural formation fractures. Wellbore plugging caused by proppant flowback and formation fines can be a problem in these wells, with severe impact on production. For most of these wells, conventional coiled-tubing (CT) cleanouts are possible, using nitrogen to lift the cleaning fluid and suspended proppant to surface. Some of these wells, however, are so underpressured that normal CT cleanouts are technically and/or economically unfeasible because of the massive amounts of nitrogen required to achieve returns to the surface. A Vacuum Cleanout Method One alternative is to clean out the fill by means of concentric coiled tubing (CCT) with a downhole-vacuum tool. The BJ Services Sand-Vac cleanout tool is based on a jet pump comprising a high-pressure nozzle, suction port, and diffuser (Fig. 1). High-pressure fluid is accelerated through the nozzle, creating a pressure drop that essentially draws in wellbore fluids, jetted fluids, and suspended solids. A diffuser allows the velocity of the combined flow to decrease and the pressure to increase. This pressure gain is sufficient to drive the column of return fluids back to the surface. To run the jet pump, power fluid is pumped down the center of a CCT string, with a portion of the fluid allowed to exit an external nozzle to fluidize wellbore solids. Returns come up the larger annulus between the inner and outer strings. Because the CCT string provides the additional flow path, the wellbore is not exposed to the return pressure and, therefore, nitrogen is not required. All of the supplied fluid is returned to the surface, leaving none in the well. This technology was born in the Canadian heavy-oil fields, and it has been proved in a decade of cleanouts around the world—especially in low-pressure, horizontal wells and in areas where nitrogen logistics are difficult or simply too expensive to justify. Alaska Gas Wells In 2006, for example, this technology was employed on the Tyonek platform in the Cook Inlet basin in southern Alaska (Rafferty et al. 2007). This platform ties together 14 wells that produce from the Cook Inlet and Beluga reservoirs, which have bottomhole-pressure (BHP) gradients of less than 0.1 psi/ft. Both reservoirs are composed of highly permeable, friable sandstones that tend to slump into unconsolidated sand piles upon exposure to water. Water breakthrough, therefore, creates major sand-production problems for wells in this area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.570

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicOil and Gas Production TechniquesFrench-language works237,207