<i>In vitro</i> effect of cyclosporin A on primary and chronic BK polyoma virus infection in Vero E6 cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cyclosporin A (CsA) is known to possess antiviral activity against several viruses in vitro, but the effect of CsA on BK polyoma virus (BKV) replication has not been examined. We investigated the impact of CsA on primary, chronic, and high-level BKV infection using a cell system of kidney cell origin (Vero E6 cells). During the first 2 h post infection, cells treated with CsA up to 3200 microg/L showed a near-identical BK viral load to untreated cells, with only a very minor reduction in the CsA-treated cells observed at 4 h. In chronic culture, CsA completely suppressed the primary BKV infection peak in a non-dose-dependent manner within the dose range of 200-12,800 microg/L (P<0.05). BKV reactivation was also inhibited in the presence of CsA at doses of 200-3200 microg/L: the mean number of BKV DNA copies/mL remained stable or even decreased slightly compared with a 7-log increase in the non-CsA group (P<0.01). CsA did not influence BKV DNA copies/mL in Vero E6 cells with high-level infection (>10(9) copies/mL). Cellular protein measurements indicated that the antiviral effect of CsA was not a result of cytotoxicity. These findings from a relevant in vitro kidney cell system indicate that CsA suppresses the primary BKV infection peak and inhibits escape to BKV reactivation; these effects are dose independent and not related to cytotoxicity. The intracellular antiviral mode of action of CsA against BKV does not appear to be via inhibition of viral cell entry pathways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".