MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CHEMOKINE EXPRESSION IN NERVE ALLOGRAFTS

2004· article· en· W2047768110 on OpenAlexaff
Rajiv Midha, Catherine A. Munro, Ramakrishna Vankayalapati, Takeshi Matsuyama, Reginald M. Gorczynski

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgery · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan and Tissue Transplantation Research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemokineMacrophage inflammatory proteinInfiltration (HVAC)MonocyteChemotaxisMedicineImmunologyTransplantationCytokineInflammationReceptorInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Chemokines (chemoattractant cytokines) play a major role in trafficking of cells to areas of inflammation. Infiltration of allograft tissues by immunocompetent cells is critical for rejection of donor tissues. The role of chemokines in nerve allograft rejection is not clear. We hypothesized that chemokines are responsible for attracting macrophages and T lymphocytes into nerve allograft tissue, initiating the graft rejection process. METHODS: Lewis rats received 4-cm-long peroneal nerve allografts and isografts from ACI and Lewis rats, respectively. Twelve hours to 10 days after transplantation, grafts were removed and total cellular ribonucleic acid was extracted. Intragraft gene expression of several chemokines (cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant, macrophage inflammatory protein [MIP]-2, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, MIP-1 alpha, and regulated upon activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted [RANTES]) were analyzed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: The cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant was expressed in allografts and isografts at early time points (12 h to 6 d). Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 messenger ribonucleic acid expression was similarly high in both isografts and allografts from 12 hours until 8 days after transplantation. MIP-1 alpha, MIP-2, and RANTES were expressed only in allografts. Kinetics of the neutrophil (MIP-2) and macrophage (MIP-1 alpha) chemokines revealed an early onset (12-24 h), a plateau from 1 to 4 days, and expression abruptly declining by Day 6. The lymphocyte chemoattractant RANTES had delayed kinetics, with a rise at Day 3, a peak at Day 4, and a gradual decline. CONCLUSION: Induction of specific chemokine genes precedes nerve allograft infiltration by immunocompetent cells. MIP-1 alpha, MIP-2, and RANTES may be responsible for recruiting macrophages, granulocytes, and lymphocytes, respectively, to the rejecting allograft. In future studies, blockade of these specific chemokines or their receptors may prove to delay or prevent nerve allograft rejection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurosurgerySame topicOrgan and Tissue Transplantation ResearchFrench-language works237,207