MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047803656 · doi:10.7202/003384ar

Focalized Attention on Input vs. Output during Simultaneous Interpretation: Possibly a Waste of Effort!

2002· article· fr· W2047803656 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sylvie Lambert, Valeria Darò, Franco Fabbro

Bibliographic record

VenueMeta Journal des traducteurs · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyInterpretation (philosophy)Linguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Afin d'établir dans quelle mesure I'attention peut être focalisée soit sur le message de départ ou soit sur le message d'arrivée, 16 sujets-interprètes ont interprété des textes simples et des textes techniques sous quatre conditions: en adoptant leurs propres stratégies; en focalisant leur attention sur le message de départ; en focalisant leur attention sur le message d'arrivée; en n'interprétant qu'une voix lorsqu'ils entendent deux messages simultanés. Puisque ces conditions n'ont abouti à aucun résultat significatif, hormis une performance légèrement meilleure pour la première condition, il semblerait que pour les interprètes chevronnés, le choix d'une stratégie par rapport à une autre semble se faire inconsciemment et automatiquement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeta Journal des traducteursSame topicInterpreting and Communication in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207