A common genetic system for functional studies of pitrilysin and related M16A proteases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pitrilysin is a bacterial protease that is similar to the mammalian insulin-degrading enzyme, which is hypothesized to protect against the onset of Alzheimer's disease, and the yeast enzymes Axl1p and Ste23p, which are responsible for production of the a-factor mating pheromone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The lack of a phenotype associated with pitrilysin deficiency has hindered studies of this enzyme. Herein, we report that pitrilysin can be heterologously expressed in yeast such that it functionally substitutes for the shared roles of Axl1p and Ste23p in pheromone production, resulting in a readily observable phenotype. We have exploited this phenotype to conduct structure-function analyses of pitrilysin and report that residues within four sequence motifs that are highly conserved among M16A enzymes are essential for its activity. These motifs include the extended metalloprotease motif, a second motif that has been hypothesized to be important for the function of M16A enzymes, and two others not previously recognized as being important for pitrilysin function. We have also established that the two self-folding domains of pitrilysin are both required for its proteolytic activity. However, pitrilysin does not possess all the enzymatic properties of the yeast enzymes since it cannot substitute for the role of Axl1p in the repression of haploid invasive growth. These observations further support the utility of the yeast system for structure-function and comparative studies of M16A enzymes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".