In Vitro Characterization of a tRNA Editing Activity in the Mitochondria of Spizellomyces punctatus, a Chytridiomycete Fungus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the chytridiomycete fungus, Spizellomyces punctatus, all eight of the mitochondrially encoded tRNAs are predicted to have one or more base pair mismatches at the first three positions of their aminoacyl acceptor stems. These tRNAs are edited post-transcriptionally by replacement of the 5'-nucleotide in each mismatched pair with a nucleotide that can form a standard Watson-Crick base pair with its counterpart in the 3'-half of the stem. The type of mitochondrial tRNA editing found in S. punctatus also occurs in Acanthamoeba castellanii, a distantly related amoeboid protist. Using an S. punctatus mitochondrial extract, we have developed an in vitro assay of tRNA editing in which nucleotides are incorporated into various tRNA substrates. Experiments employing synthetic transcripts revealed that the S. punctatus tRNA editing activity incorporates nucleotides on the 5'-side of substrate tRNAs, uses the 3'-sequence as a template for incorporation, and adds nucleotides in a 3'-to-5' direction. This activity can add nucleotides to a triphosphorylated 5'-end in the absence of ATP but requires ATP to add nucleotides to a monophosphorylated 5'-end; moreover, it functions independently of the state of tRNA 3' processing. These data parallel results obtained in a previous in vitro study of A. castellanii tRNA editing, suggesting that remarkably similar activities function in the mitochondria of these two organisms. The evolutionary origins of these activities are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".