Bibliographic record
Abstract
In surgical release of trigger fingers both transverse and longitudinal incisions are often used in the four fingers; however, in the thumb, a longitudinal linear incision can be somewhat tight and tethered and uncomfortable for many months. A transverse incision runs the risk of potential damage to the superficial underlying neurovascular bundles (1) and gives less adequate exposure to longitudinally release the flexor tendon sheath pulley. A V-shaped incision for trigger thumbs is advocated by many as the procedure of choice to avoid these two problems (2). A V-shaped incision is unnecessarily long, and proper alignment of the skin margins involves first an interrupted suture at the apex followed by suturing of both limbs. The author has devised a very simple variation on this, called a checkmark incision. This is as safe as the V-shaped incision but resembles a checkmark. The neurovascular bundles are easily avoided, and the tendon sheath released under direct vision. I close only the apex and the long limb with a running suture, and usually leave the short limb open to reduce postoperative edema where feasible (Figures 1A and and1B).1B). The short limb is best placed proximally where there is less longitudinal force tending to open it. Figure 1) A The checkmark incision leaving the short limb open. B Full flexion post-tendon release The incision is planned by marking a central longitudinal line over the origin of the tendon sheath. The short limb is one-quarter to one-third the length of the long arm. The tip of the short limb is at or slightly over the midline of the centre of the ray with an angle of about 90° (Figures 2A and and2C).2C). Visualization of the tendon sheath is equivalent to any other incision (Figure 2B), but the safety factor is greater than in a transverse approach. Figure 2) A Proposed incision. B Excellent visualization with the Canica Palm Spring Retractor (Canica Design Inc, Canada). C Closed incision. The short limb component was oozing sufficiently that another suture was used This is a good technique for all trigger fingers, and avoids the potentially tight, tethered, uncomfortable longitudinal scar that can take months to resolve in second to fifth ray incisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".