MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047907491 · doi:10.1002/bdra.10001

Epidemiologic analysis of maternal factors and amniotic band defects

2003· article· en· W2047907491 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martha M. Werler, Carol Louik, Allen A. Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueBirth Defects Research Part A Clinical and Molecular Teratology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsMedicineEnvironmental healthObstetrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The group of defects identified as amniotic bands includes amnion rupture sequence (ARS) and body wall complex (BWC). Little is known about risk factors for either ARS or BWC, except that maternal age has been shown to affect risk inversely. METHODS: The present analysis used data collected from 1976 to 1998 as part of an ongoing case control study of birth defects in the metropolitan areas of Boston, Philadelphia, and Toronto. There were 73 cases with ARS and 11 cases with BWC. ARS cases were further subdivided according to affected structures: there were 53 with only limbs affected (ARS-L) and 20 with nonlimb defects with or without limb defects (ARS-NL). The control group comprised 12,227 subjects with other major malformations. Mothers were interviewed within 6 months of delivery about demographic, reproductive, medical, and behavioral factors. RESULTS: Multivariate adjusted odds ratios for BWC were increased more than threefold for maternal age < 25 years and maternal education < 12 years, but neither estimate was statistically significant. Corresponding estimates for ARS-L and ARS-NL ranged from 13 to 1.5 and also were not statistically significant. Cases were less likely to be white non-Hispanic than controls and the odds ratio for ARS-NL excluded the null. The multivariate adjusted odds ratio (MVOR) for unplanned pregnancy and BWC was 1.9 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-6.7) compared to 1.2 and 1.0 for ARS-L and ARS-NL, respectively. Neither parity nor maternal smoking was associated with any case group. The MVORs for first trimester acetaminophen use in relation to ARS-L and ARS-NL risks were 2.1 (1.1-3.9) and 3.4 (1.1-10.3), respectively. Such use was less common among BWC cases (MVOR was 0.4; 0.1-1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Risk estimates tended to be similar for ARS-L and ARS-NL cases but different for BWC cases, suggesting different etiologies. These data suggest that young maternal age, low maternal education, unplanned pregnancy, and non-white/non-Hispanic race/ethnicity might increase the risk of BWC in offspring. Inceased risks for acetaminophen use should be interpreted with caution because they may be confounded by indication for use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBirth Defects Research Part A Clinical and Molecular TeratologySame topicCongenital Anomalies and Fetal SurgeryFrench-language works237,207