Immunological detection of changes in genomic DNA methylation during early zebrafish development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DNA methylation reprogramming, the erasure of DNA methylation patterns shortly after fertilization and their reestablishment during subsequent early development, is essential for proper mammalian embryogenesis. In contrast, the importance of this process in the development of non-mammalian vertebrates such as fish is less clear. Indeed, whether or not any widespread changes in DNA methylation occur at all during cleavage and blastula stages of fish in a fashion similar to that shown in mammals has remained controversial. Here we have addressed this issue by applying the techniques of Southwestern immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry with an anti-5-methylcytosine antibody to the examination of DNA methylation in early zebrafish embryos. These techniques have recently been utilized to demonstrate that development-specific changes in genomic DNA methylation also occur in Drosophila melanogaster and Dictyostelium discoideum, both organisms for which DNA methylation was previously not thought to occur. Our data demonstrate that genome-wide changes in DNA methylation occur during early zebrafish development. Although zebrafish sperm DNA is strongly methylated, the zebrafish genome is not detectably methylated through cleavage and early blastula stages but is heavily remethylated in blastula and early gastrula stages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".