Snow Studies. Part I: A Study of Natural Variability of Snow Terminal Velocity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The variability and the uncertainties in snowfall velocity measurements are addressed in this study. The authors consider (i) the instrumental uncertainty in the fall velocity measurement, (ii) the effect of unstable falling motion on the accuracy of velocity measurement, and (iii) the natural variability of homogeneous snow terminal fall velocity. It is shown that, when periods of homogeneous characteristics of snow are selected to minimize the mixture of particles of different origin, the standard deviation of snowfall velocity within each period tends to stabilize at a value between 0.1 and 0.2 m s−1. In addition, the variability of snow terminal fall velocity is examined with three control variables: surface temperature Ts, echo-top temperature Tt, and the depth of precipitation system H. The results show that the exponent b in the power-law relationship V = aDb has little effect on the variability of snowfall velocity: the coefficient a correlates much better with the control variables (Ts, Tt, H) than the exponent b. Hence, snowfall velocity can be modeled with a varying coefficient a and a fixed exponent b = 0.18 (V = aD0.18) with good accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it