Reconfigurable microfluidic chip based on a light-sensitive hydrogel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glass is often used as a substrate material for developing microfluidic chips because it is hydrophilic (attracts and holds moisture), chemically inert, stable over time, optically clear, non-porous, and can be fabricated at low cost. However, the size and geometry of the various components, flow channels and fluid reservoirs are all fixed on the substrate material at the time of microfabrication. Recent advances on the development of a light driven microactuator for actively changing the size and geometry of micro features, based on a photo-responsive hydrogel, are described in this paper. Each discrete microactuator in the platform structure is a bi-layered hydrogel that exploits the ionic nature of the pH sensitive polymer blend of polyethylenimine (PEI) and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), and the proton pumping ability of the retinal protein bacteriorhodopsin (bR). When irradiated by a light source with a peak response of 568 nm the bR molecules in the (bR-PVA) layer undergo a complex photocycle that causes protons to be pumped into the adjoining pH sensitive (PEI-PVA) layer. The diffusion of similarly charged ions through the second actuating layer generates electrostatic repulsive and attractive forces which alter the osmotic pressure within the cross-linked polymer network. Depending upon the type of electrostatic forces generated, the pH sensitive hydrogel layer will swell or, alternatively, collapse. The fabrication of the (bR-PVA)-(PEI-PVA) hydrogel microactuator is described and the experimental results from preliminary tests are presented. The application of the light sensitive hydrogels to developing a reconfigurable microchip platform is briefly discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".