Application of a real-time PCR method for the detection of pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, in wood samples from lodgepole pine
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A real-time PCR polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) method was developed to detect and differentiate Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (pine wood nematode, PWN) from other wood-inhabiting nematode species. A primer set and a specific Taqman® fluorescent probe were designed to amplify target B. xylophilus heat shock protein 70 sequences. After optimization, this real-time PCR assay was shown to be highly specific and sensitive, detecting at least 0.005 ng of B. xylophilus genomic DNA, as well as DNA extracted from single nematodes. The practical application of this real-time PCR diagnostic method for the detection of B. xylophilus from actual wood samples of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta, Dougl. var. latifolia) trees containing a heterogeneous population of nematodes, rather than pure cultures or individual nematodes, is demonstrated. This method works well in the presence of potential inhibitors associated with wood after Baermann extraction and thus eliminates the need to produce pure nematode samples through further culturing and/or isolation of nematodes with a high-power microscope.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it