Gratiarum Actio: Ad Societatem Canadensem Studiorum Antiquorum Aº MMVIII
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gratiarum Actio:Ad Societatem Canadensem Studiorum Antiquorum Aº MMVIII J.C. Yardley O urbs Montis Regii, regina urbium, quo, si licet meam propriam vitam leviter attingere, ad coetum annuum nostrae societatis dignissimae multis abhinc annis primum veni, quam te libenter quamque laetus te iterum viso.1 Huc, huc, ocelle, multos post annos cum sodalibus doctissimis ad eundem coetum denuo reveni ut nos tua delicia gaudiaque hauriamus dum studia nostra Graeca Latinaque in tuo sinu amoenissimo inter orationes et disceptationes eruditas non sine oblectationibus vespertinis persequimus. At, sodales, his deliciis voluptatibusque iam paene confectis, nonne revertemur domum ut cives ingrati si collegae nostri quorum hospitio officiisque omnia hic tam feliciter prospereque evenerunt inlaudati remanebunt? Itaque paucis quidem verbis, sed valde ad rem, illis pro nostra contione societateque gratias bene meritas agam. Et primo ad te me vertam, care Bonecare,2 arbiter optime nostrarum elegantiarum lasciviarumque, qui et ante nostrum adventum labore hercle! paene Herculeo omnia exquisitissime maximaque cura nobis praeparavisti. Corolla altera plane tibi tribuenda est, Vaye Liapi3, pro quo, ne auditoribus ludibrio sim, nomen Latinum etiam quaerere non audeo, exemplum sequens Ovidii nostri qui nomen sui amici Tuticani, contra legem pedis, in elegiis ex Ponto scriptis inmutatum reliquit.4 Nec praetereunda est haec aedes studiorum universorum, Universitas Montis regii, fautor munificus studiorum nostrorum huiusque congressionis alma patrona. Sunt etiam alii quorum opibus adiutae sunt res nostrae nosterque conventus, sed si omnes nomine nominem, heu ante diem clauso componet Vesper Olympo.5 Vos igitur mihi ignoscatis, quaeso, praesertim benefactores nostri Graeci discipulique illi huius universitatis qui officiis multis, Juppiter, et laboriosis6 curaverunt ut conventus noster tam [End Page 113] fauste feliciterque floreret. Si nomina vestra nunc silentio praeterita sunt, discipuli, sciatis licet me ea in paginis Mousei nostri mox positurum7; et mementote, verba emissa, Latina quoque, volant, sed littera scripta manet, Quare, sodales, adstantes his omnibus animo grato plaudetis, vos precor. [End Page 114] Footnotes 1. Catullus 31.1–4 2. Pierre Bonnechère, conference organizer. 3. Vayos Liapis, also conference organizer. 4. Ovid, Ex Ponto 4.12. 1–4. 5. Vergil, Aeneid 1.374. 6. Catullus 1.1.7. Sponsors of the meeting: The Consulate-General of Greece (Montréal); The Hellenic Heritage Foundation (Toronto); L'Université de Montréal (Le vice-rectorat à la recherche, le vice-décanat à la recherche de la Faculté des Arts et des Sciences, Le centre d'études classiques, Le département de philosophie, Le département des literatures de langue francaise, le département d'histoire, la faculté de musique). Student volunteers: Marie Clermont-Migneault, Fannie Dionne, Francois Gauthier, Mathieu Labadie, Daniel Levy, Christopher Lougheed, Adrian Mihae, Yannick Stafford, Andrew Swidzinski, Samuel Trottier, and Marc Umba. 7. Mouseion, Journal of the Classical Association of Canada. Copyright © 2008 Mouseion
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.189 | 0.081 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".