MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048156570 · doi:10.2495/sdp-v1-n1-46-60

National translation of the Eu landfill directives

2006· article· en· W2048156570 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Van Praagh, Kenneth M. Persson

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandfill Environmental Impact Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncinerationWaste managementLegislationMunicipal solid wasteSustainabilityDirectiveEnvironmental planningEnvironmental scienceLandfill gasPollutantBusinessEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The key issues of the EU Landfill Directives (1999/31/EC and 2003/33/EC) are elucidated with respect to the directives' objectives towards sustainable waste management.In countries such as Sweden the national translation of the directives' requirements will lead to dryer landfills with relatively more municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration residues.Numerous landfills have been closed before the initially envisaged date.They will not be subject to the advanced closing procedure for landfills according to the translation of the EU directives.Together with former unengineered dumps, these landfills will outnumber the compliant landfills by far.The former are neither subject to the Swedish national translation of the Landfill Directives nor to any other EU or national legislation.Often lacking active and even passive barrier systems, the emission potential of these landfills seems to be able to overshadow that of the reduced number of remaining EU directive-compliant landfills.These landfills will eventually be regarded as contaminated areas.In countries such as Sweden a substitution of MSW landfills by incineration facilities will result in a more rapid and likely increased release of carbon dioxide emissions (among other air pollutants) per tonne of produced waste.Thus, a comparative assessment of the overall impact of waste management options on different timescales for emissions should be done on a countryby-country basis to assess sustainability of the translation of the Landfill Directives.The physical-chemical and microbiological properties of the resulting storage conditions governing the landfills' emission potentials are unknown to a great extent.A prolonged risk of relevant emissions has to be taken into account for compliant landfills due to possible moisture scarcity and subsequent slower degradation rates.On the one hand, leaching of degradation products could be extended, albeit in reduced concentrations.On the other hand, longer contact time with water can enhance leaching of, for example, hydrophilic substances.Concentration and/or mass peaks might be postponed compared to earlier, 'wetter' landfilling with a higher content of easily degradable organic waste.Without addressing and answering these uncertainties, it remains doubtful it the national translation of the Landfill Directives will lead to sustainable waste management in the long run.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesFrench-language works237,207