MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048187835 · doi:10.4161/cam.3.2.7229

A novel role for the Ste20 kinase SLK in adhesion signaling and cell migration

2009· review· en· W2048187835 on OpenAlexafffund
Simona Wagner, Luc A. Sabourin

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Adhesion & Migration · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCell biologyFocal adhesionCell migrationKinaseMAPK/ERK pathwayMotilityProto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase SrcMicrotubuleActinCell growthASK1Signal transductionChemistryBiologyCellProtein kinase ACyclin-dependent kinase 2Biochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With over 60 members, the Sterile 20 family of kinases has been implicated in numerous biological processes, including growth, survival, apoptosis and cell migration. Recently, we have shown that, in addition to cell death, the Ste20-like kinase SLK is required for efficient cell migration in fibroblasts. We have observed that SLK is involved in cell motility through its effect on actin reorganization and microtubule-induced focal adhesion turnover. Scratch wounding of confluent monolayers results in SLK activation. The induction of SLK kinase activity requires the scaffold FAK and a MAPK-dependent pathway. However, its recruitment to the leading edge of migrating fibroblasts requires the activity of the Src family kinases. Since SLK is microtubule-associated, it may represent one of the signals delivered to focal contacts that induces adhesions turnover. A speculative model is proposed to illustrate the mechanism of SLK activation and recruitment at the leading edge of migrating cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell Adhesion & MigrationSame topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207