Guiding Adult Mammalian Sensory Axons During Regeneration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Misdirection of axons after nerve injury impairs successful regeneration of adult neurons. Investigations of axon guidance in development have provided an understanding of pathfinding, but their relevance to regenerating adult axons is unclear. We investigated adult mammalian axon guidance during regeneration after peripheral nerve injury and focused on the effects of the prototypic guidance molecule nerve growth factor (NGF). Adult rat sensory neurons from dorsal root ganglia that expressed the NGF receptor tropomyosin-related kinase A (trkA) were presented with a point source of NGF in vitro. Naive trkA neurons had no net turning response to NGF, but if they had been preconditioned by a peripheral nerve transection in vivo before culturing, their growth cones were attracted toward the NGF gradient. A laminin substrate was required for this behavior and an anti-trkA antibody interrupted turning. These data demonstrate that injured adult mammalian axons can be guided as they regenerate. Moreover, despite the downregulation of trkA mRNA and protein levels within the dorsal root ganglion after injury, sensory neurons retain and increase trkA protein at the injury site where the regenerating axons are found. This may enhance the axonal response to NGF and allow guidance along an NGF gradient created in vivo in the distal nerve stump.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".