Discovery of a Potent and Selective Prostaglandin D<sub>2</sub> Receptor Antagonist, [(3<i>R</i>)-4-(4-Chloro- benzyl)-7-fluoro-5-(methylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrocyclopenta[<i>b</i>]indol-3-yl]-acetic Acid (MK-0524)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The discovery of the potent and selective prostaglandin D2 (PGD2) receptor (DP) antagonist [(3R)-4-(4-chlorobenzyl)-7-fluoro-5-(methylsulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrocyclopenta[b]indol-3-yl]-acetic acid (13) is presented. Initial lead antagonists 6 and 7 were found to be potent and selective DP antagonists (DP Ki = 2.0 nM for each); however, they both suffered from poor pharmacokinetic profiles, short half-lives and high clearance rates in rats. Rat bile duct cannulation studies revealed that high concentrations of parent drug were present in the biliary fluid (Cmax = 1100 microM for 6 and 3900 microM for 7). This pharmacokinetic liability was circumvented by replacing the 7-methylsulfone substituent present in 6 and 7 with a fluorine atom resulting in antagonists with diminished propensity for biliary excretion and with superior pharmacokinetic profiles. Further optimization led to the discovery of the potent and selective DP antagonist 13.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it