MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048270278 · doi:10.1504/ijesb.2010.034953

The future of entrepreneurship research: results of a research workshop with invited speakers and discussants at the International Council for Small Business World Conference in Halifax

2010· article· en· W2048270278 on OpenAlexaffabout
Louis Jacques Filion, Léo‐Paul Dana, Pierre‐André Julien, José M. Veciana, Tor Aase Johannessen, Matthias G. Raith

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsBombardier (Canada)Université du Québec à Trois-RivièresHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipWork (physics)Political scienceLibrary scienceInternational businessPublic relationsSociologyManagementEngineeringEconomicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This publication presents a summary of the presentations made in a workshop on June 23rd, 2008 at the ICSB World Conference held in Halifax, Canada. It also presents the highlights of the discussion that followed these presentations. The participants exchanged on the need to develop more theoretical approaches in entrepreneurship and suggested ways to work in that direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.200
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.122 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small BusinessSame topicEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207