Phospha-Münchnones: Electronic Structures and 1,3-Dipolar Cycloadditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reaction of imines, acid chlorides, PR(3), and base generates a new class of 1,3-dipoles: phospha-Munchnones. These 1,3-dipoles can undergo cycloadditions with alkynes followed by loss of phosphine oxides to form pyrroles. Cycloaddition reactivity is dependent upon the PR(3) employed, with PhP(catechyl) (catechyl = o-O(2)C(6)H(4)) providing the most rapid cycloadditions and optimal pyrrole yields. (1)H, (13)C, and (31)P NMR analysis and computations indicate that electron-poor catechyl-substituted phosphonites and phosphites favor a cyclic 1,3-dipolar structure, while more electron-rich phosphines instead favor the valence tautomeric acyclic ylides. X-ray crystallographic studies confirm this. Density functional theory calculations support the wide variety of P-O interactions induced by different PR(3) groups and indicate that the most efficient concerted 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions are those for dipoles whose ground-state geometry is most like the transition-state geometry. Reactions of these dipoles with monosubstituted alkynes bearing an electron-withdrawing group are calculated to occur by stepwise mechanisms. The presence of the phosphorus unit creates a large electronic bias across the 1,3-dipole, allowing for regioselective cycloadditions with substituted alkynes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".