Deuterium labeling as a test of intramolecular hydride mechanisms in the fragmentation of 2-(1-hydroxybenzyl)-N1′-methylthiamin
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
2-(1-Hydroxybenzyl)-N1′-methylthiamin (1b) is a model for the addition intermediate in the thiamin catalyzed benzoin condensation. However, N-alkylation alters the reactivity of the compound: instead of undergoing base-catalyzed formation of benzaldehyde and N1′-methylthiamin, it rapidly forms trimethyl amino pyrimidine (2b) and phenylthiazole ketone (3). The base-catalyzed fragmentation process is faster than the analogous enzymic reaction (in benzoylformate decarboxylase) under the same conditions. One possible mechanism for the rapid fragmentation is an internal hydride transfer from α-C2 to the methylene bridge between the heterocycles. To test the hydride mechanism we prepared α-C2-deuterated 1b and conducted the fragmentation reaction in normal water. Spectroscopic analysis revealed that the trimethyl aminopyrimidine product does not contain any deuterium, ruling out a hydride transfer mechanism. This supports a mechanism for fragmentation that proceeds instead via a proton transfer from α-C2. Since protonation (and hence, deprotonation) of that site is part of the normal catalytic cycle of benzoylformate decarboxylase, the enzyme must divert the reaction from the lowest energy pathway since it would share a common intermediate with the fragmentation process.Key words: thiamin, fragmentation, benzoylformate decarboxylase, proton transfer, hydride shift.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it