MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048336700 · doi:10.1051/forest:2003040

Root biomass distribution under three cover types in a patchy <i>Pseudotsuga menziesii</i> forest in western Canada

2003· article· en· W2048336700 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andrew D. Richardson, Catherine Bealle Statland, Timothy G. Grégoire

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Forest Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest ecology and management
Canadian institutionsGovernment of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiomass (ecology)ForestryDistribution (mathematics)Environmental scienceCover (algebra)Douglas firForest managementGeographyAgroforestryEcologyBiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigated the relationship between cover type and root biomass distribution and allocation to different root size classes in a naturally regenerated, dry, Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var.glauca) forest in the southern interior of British Columbia, Canada.The site was selectively harvested 32 years previously; residual stems were 30 cm and 130-170 years old at breast height at the time of study.A total of nine pits (each measuring 1.0 m × 1.0 m) were excavated to a depth of 1.0 m under three different cover types: mature timber, grassy (Calamagrostis rubescens) openings (canopy gaps), and regeneration clumps.Total (all diameters) live root biomass ranged from 4.7 kg/m 2 under the mature timber to 1.9 kg/m 2 under both regeneration clumps and grassy openings.Thin root (0.1 cm < φ ≤ 0.5 cm) biomass was similar across all three cover types (0.8 kg/m 2 ).We suggest that the similarity of thin root biomass across the three cover types is indicative of strong root competition at this resource-poor site: there appears to be no below-ground "root gap" corresponding to the canopy opening above the pinegrass-dominated patches.Calamagrostis rubescens / Douglas-fir / gap / Pseudotsuga menziesii / root biomass Résumé -Distribution de la biomasse racinaire sous trois types de couvert dans une forêt irrégulière de Pseudotsuga menziesii du Canada occidental.Nous avons étudié la relation entre le type de couvert et la répartition de la biomasse racinaire entre différentes classes de dimension des racines, dans une forêt sèche régénérée naturellement de Douglas des Montagnes Rocheuses (Pseudotsuga menziesii var.glauca) située dans la zone intérieure méridionale de la Colombie Britannique au Canada.Cette station avait subi une coupe à la dimension 32 ans auparavant.Les tiges restantes, âgées de 130 à 170 ans, avaient, au moment de l'étude, un diamètre à hauteur d'homme de 30 cm.On a creusé neuf fosses mesurant chacune 1,0 × 1,0 × 1,0 m sous trois types de couvert : peuplement adulte, clairières à graminées (Calamagrostis rubescens) et bouquets de régénération.La biomasse racinaire totale (tous diamètres) va de 4,7 kg/m 2 sous peuplement adulte à 1,9 kg/m 2 sous les bouquets de régénération et sous clairières à graminées.La biomasse des racines fines (0,1 cm < φ ≤ 0,5 cm) était du même ordre sous les trois types de couvert (0,8 kg/m 2 ).Nous suggérons que cette similitude des valeurs de biomasse de racines fines entre les trois types de couvert est l'indice de l'existence d'une forte concurrence entre racines, dans cette station pauvre en ressources.Les ouvertures dans le couvert forestier se traduisent par des clairières à Calamagrostis qui ne sont pas des zones sans racines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.744
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Forest ScienceSame topicForest ecology and managementFrench-language works237,207