MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048336976 · doi:10.1071/rdv24n1ab227

227 SUPEROVULATION AND EMBRYO COLLECTION IN WOOD BISON DURING THE ANOVULATORY SEASON

2011· article· en· W2048336976 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. M. Palomino, Robert McCorkell, M. Anzar, Murray R. Woodbury, N. Hawkins, J. R. Prentice, Behzad M. Toosi, Gregory P. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsTrusted Positioning (Canada)University of CalgaryUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBison bisonFollicular phaseOvulationBiologyArtificial inseminationSeasonal breederInseminationFollicleAndrologyAnimal scienceEndocrinologyMedicinePregnancySpermZoologyEcologyHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brucellosis and tuberculosis are endemic in Wood Buffalo National Park, the largest reserve of wood bison (Bison bison athabascae) in Canada. Our goal is to produce and preserve disease-free embryos for the purpose of wood bison repopulation. This study was designed to determine if embryo collection is feasible in wood bison during the anovulatory season (May–July) and to test if progesterone priming is required for superovulation. A 2-by-2 design was used to determine the effectiveness of LH (Lutropin) or hCG (Chorulon) for induction of ovulation with or without intravaginal progesterone releasing device (PRID) in 32 wood bison cows. Follicular wave emergence was synchronized among bison by transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle ablation. Synchronized bison were assigned to 4 groups: PRID+LH (n = 12), PRID+hCG (n = 4), no-PRID+LH (n = 12) and no-PRID+hCG (n = 4). A PRID was inserted on the day of follicular ablation in the respective groups. A single SC dose of 400 mg FSH (Folltropin) in a slow-release formulation was given the day after follicular ablation (i.e. on the expected day of a new follicular wave emergence, Day 0). The PRID was removed on Day 4 and either 25 mg LH or 2000 IU hCG was given IM on Day 5. Artificial insemination was done at 24, 36 and 48 h after LH or hCG treatment. Embryos were collected nonsurgically on Day 13 using commercial bovine equipment. Transrectal ultrasonography was done on Days 0, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 13 to record follicular and ovulatory responses. Count data (mean ± SEM) were analysed by two-way ANOVA and proportions by chi square. The number of ovulatory-sized follicles (=10 mm) on Day 5 did not differ among groups (P = 0.33; Table 1). Ovulation rate (number of ovulations/number of follicles =10 mm) was greater in bison treated with hCG (P < 0.05; Table 1). The number of corpora lutea (CL) on Day 13 was greater in bison treated with hCG without a PRID (P < 0.05; Table 1). No differences in number of ova/embryos and transferable embryos were found among groups (P = 0.36 and P = 0.52, respectively; Table 1). In conclusion, progesterone priming (PRID) had no effect on ovarian superstimulation in wood bison in the anovulatory season. The ovulatory response was satisfactory only in bison treated with hCG. Embryo collection is feasible in wood bison, but the reasons for a low embryo collection rate in all groups remain unclear. Table 1. Response to superovulation and embryo collection in wood bison Funded by Advancing Canadian Agriculture and Agri-Food and Agri-Food Innovation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207