MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2048337438 · doi:10.3168/jds.2012-5491

Effects of method of barley grain processing and source of supplemental dietary fat on duodenal nutrient flows, milk fatty acid profiles, and microbial protein synthesis in dairy cows

2012· article· en· W2048337438 on OpenAlexafffund
T. Mutsvangwa, M.R. Hobin, G.N. Gozho

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanola Council of Canada
KeywordsLatin squareDry matterCanolaChemistryFood scienceNutrientRumenAnimal scienceDairy cattleTotal mixed rationDigestion (alchemy)Fatty acidLactationBiologyBiochemistryIce calving

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to determine the interactive effects of barley grain processing and source of supplemental fat on ruminal nutrient digestion, duodenal nutrient flow, microbial protein synthesis, and milk fatty acid (FA) profiles in dairy cows. Four Holstein cows (656 ± 28 kg of BW; 80 ± 12 d in milk) fitted with permanent ruminal and duodenal cannulas were used in a 4×4 Latin square design with a 2×2 factorial arrangement of experimental treatments, in which barley was either dry-rolled (DRB) or pelleted (PB) and supplemented with full-fat canola seed (canola) or full-fat flaxseed (flaxseed). Cows fed DRB consumed 1.8 to 3.5 kg/d more dry matter compared with those fed PB. Mean ruminal pH was lower and the duration (min/d) and area (pH × min) of total ruminal acidosis (RA; ruminal pH <5.8), mild RA (5.8 >ruminal pH >5.5), and severe RA (5.5 >ruminal pH >5.2), and the duration of acute RA (ruminal pH <5.2) were greater in cows fed PB compared with those fed DRB. Milk yield was unaffected by diet. Milk fat content and yield were greater in cows fed DRB than in cows fed PB. Cows fed PB had greater duodenal flows of C18:1 trans, C18:1 cis, C18:2 trans-9,trans-12, C18:2 trans-9,cis-12, C18:2 trans-11,cis-15, and C18:2 trans-10,cis-12 compared with those fed DRB. Duodenal flows of C18:1 cis, C18:1 trans, total C18:1, C18:2n6, C18:2 cis-9,trans-11, C18:2 trans-10,cis-12, C18:2 trans-11,trans-13, total conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), and C18:3n3 were greater in cows fed flaxseed compared with those fed canola. Milk concentrations of C18:3n3 and total CLA tended to be greater in cows fed PB compared with those fed DRB. When compared with cows fed canola, milk concentrations of C18:2 trans-11,cis-15, C18:2 cis-9,trans-11, C18:2 trans-11,trans-13, total CLA, and C18:3n3 were greater in cows fed flaxseed. Ruminal digestion of neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber was greater in cows fed DRB compared with those fed PB. Duodenal flow of ammonia-N tended to be greater in cows fed PB compared with those fed DRB. Duodenal flow of nonammonia nonmicrobial N was greater in cows fed flaxseed compared with those fed canola; however, barley grain processing did not affect duodenal nonammonia nonmicrobial N flow. Duodenal flow of microbial nonammonia N and microbial efficiency were not affected by diet. In summary, barley grain processing and source of fat altered ruminal FA biohydrogenation, and this was reflected in changes in duodenal FA flow and milk FA profiles; however, ruminal microbial protein synthesis was unaltered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy Science→Same topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology→French-language works237,207→