Late Cretaceous – Eocene interval of the Apulian passive margin in Albania (Kruje-Dajt and Makareshi massifs, Kruja Zone): facies, micro-organisms and sedimentary cycles of a shallow-water carbonate platform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Two sections, respectively in the Kruje-Dajt and Makareshi massifs of the Kruja Zone carbonate platform (located in the Apulian passive margin of Albania), and representing a period which extends from the Late Cretaceous to the Eocene, have been studied from several points of view : biostratigraphy, lithology and sequence stratigraphy. The proposed biozonation for the Late Cretaceous which has been established with benthic foraminifera (CsB4, CsB5, CsB6 and CsB7) improves substantially the stratigraphy for this period in this region. Eleven different facies (F1 to F11) characterise the Upper Cretaceous-Paleocene-Eocene carbonate sediments, and are distinguished for the first time. Fourteen sequences in the Kruje-Dajt massif and seven sequences in the Makareshi massif are recognized, using sedimentological criteria and clearly distinguished according to an established model for calcareous facies of this platform. Intense early dolomitization (sebkha type) is generally superimposed to the facies. The two sections represent a mostly homogeneous environment, evolving from the infra to supratidal environments. However, small variations of subenvironments are observed and linked to local and temporary variations of the platform. They are attributed to frequent eustatic fluctuations, and in two cases at least to instabilities of the platform which had cause emergencies and temporal discontinuities at the end of Cretaceous and early Eocene times (ca 20 and 5 m.y.).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".