Cyst‐based toxicity tests. XVIII. Application of ostracodtoxkit microbiotest in a bioremediation project of oil‐contaminated sediments: Sensitivity comparison with <i>Hyalella azteca</i> solid‐phase assay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To further validate the scope of use of the 6-day sediment contact microbiotest conducted with the ostracod Heterocypris incongruens, we compared the sensitivity of this small-scale culture/maintenance-free assay with the 14-day solid-phase Hyalella azteca test. The present study was undertaken within the framework of a Canadian bioremediation project on oil-contaminated freshwater sediments along an intertidal shoreline of the Saint-Lawrence River near the town of Sainte-Croix, Quebec, Canada. Sediment subsamples, collected during three sampling periods over 21 weeks from five plots (each with four replicates) contaminated with different treatments, were analyzed for their toxic effects on the two test species. Sediment samples taken immediately after the plots were spread with oil were very toxic to both crustaceans (mortality between 80% and 100%), but the mortality of the amphipods was substantially lower than that of the ostracods for samples collected after 6 weeks. Fifteen weeks after the onset of the controlled oil spill experiment, the sediments of all plots were still quite toxic to Heterocypris but not to Hyalella. Statistical analysis of the mortality figures was performed by Blaise et at. (2003) and revealed a statistically significant correlation (R = 0.584 at the P = 0.001 level) between data pairs. Analysis of the precision of the two assays showed a substantially higher uniformity (lower variation coefficients between the four replicas) of the ostracod results over that of the amphipod assay. This study corroborated the findings of two previous investigations conducted in Canada and in Belgium with the same test species. All three investigations concur in pointing out the potential of the new ostracod microbiotest as a reliable and sensitive ecotoxicological test for routine and low-cost monitoring of contaminated sediments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".