MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Chapter 3: Pig islet product manufacturing and release testing

2009· article· en· W2048399630 on OpenAlexaff
Gregory S. Korbutt

Bibliographic record

VenueXenotransplantation · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersU.S. Food and Drug Administration
KeywordsIsletProduct (mathematics)Computer scienceMedicineDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter provides recommendations on pig islet product manufacturing and release testing to scientific and corporate programs interested in future clinical studies using xenogeneic porcine pancreatic islet cell products for the treatment of type 1 diabetes.To facilitate control of manufacturing as well as reproducibility and consistency of product lots, the manufacturing process, and the manufacturing facility must be in compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices regulations. Data must be provided to demonstrate that islet products can be consistently prepared that would meet basic lot release requirements. To facilitate product safety: (i) materials used in the manufacturing process, including the pig pancreas, must be free of adventitious agents; (ii) islets must be manufactured using aseptic processing; and (iii) final product must undergo tests for sterility, mycoplasma (if cultured) and endotoxin. Safety specifications for pig islet product release include a negative Gram stain and an endotoxin content of <5.0 EU/kg recipient body weight. Product post-release assessments must include sterility cultures on the final product. Because results for sterility are available only retrospectively, a plan of action must be in place for patient notification and treatment in case the sterility culture results are positive for contamination. Product characterization information must address important aspects of lot release testing such as identity/purity (cell composition), quantity [islet equivalents (IE), cell number] and potency (insulin secretory capacity, oxygen consumption rate corrected for DNA or transplant bioassay in immunoincompetent diabetic mice). This information is also critical to demonstrate manufacturing control and product consistency across multiple islet preparations (lots). Providing islet products containing an islet mass sufficient to restore euglycemia in trial participants (>or=10 000 IE/kg) requires pooling of islets from multiple donor pancreata (two to four from adult donors and seven to 10 from neonatal donors). Demonstration of product consistency across products from individual pancreata would warrant release testing to be performed on a sample of the pooled product. As product development and clinical trials advance, the increasingly more detailed specifications of potency assays on adult porcine islet products are expected to be predictive of post-transplant glycemic control. The immaturity of fetal and neonatal porcine islet tissue precludes the use of in vitro insulin secretion as a potency test as part of lot release testing; another measure of potency appropriate to fetal and neonatal cells will need to be developed for product release testing and evaluation of aliquots of these products in mouse transplant bioassays should be performed to provide meaningful post-release information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.408
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueXenotransplantationSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207