Reovirus Salvage of Squamous Cell Cancer-Contaminated Wounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the susceptibility of human squamous cell carcinoma to reovirus infection in vitro and in vivo using a murine model of cancer-contaminated wounds. METHODS: The University of Michigan squamous carcinoma 22B cell line was cultured and inoculated with reovirus in vitro. The effect of the reovirus was assessed with microscopy and a standard 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. We used the previously established cancer-contaminated wound SCID mouse model to test saline and reovirus irrigation in vivo. Fifty-five mice were used; 15 were controls, 20 had immediate irrigation, and 20 had delayed irrigation. Surgical sites were assessed for palpable tumour biweekly. RESULTS: The microscopy and MTT assay both showed evidence of reovirus-mediated squamous cancer cell lysis. The control mice grew palpable tumours in 80% of the wounds. Immediate irrigation with saline delayed the onset of palpable tumour and demonstrated a persistent reduction in the rate of development of palpable tumours (p = .004 compared with controls). This effect disappeared when the saline irrigation was delayed, resulting in a tumour development rate that was not significantly different from that of the control. Wounds that were irrigated with reovirus, both immediately and delayed, did not produce palpable tumour (p < .0005 when compared with controls). CONCLUSIONS: (1) The University of Michigan squamous cell carcinoma 22B cell line is susceptible to reovirus in vitro. (2) Immediate irrigation with saline resulted in a significant delay in clinically evident tumour growth and a reduction in the rate of tumour development in the SCID mouse model. (3) The reovirus irrigation resulted in a significant reduction of tumour development in both the immediate and delayed groups in the SCID mouse model. (4) The efficacy of the reovirus irrigation in the delayed group suggests that the major mechanism of action is through a selective and specific targeting of implanted cancer cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".