MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048426891 · doi:10.1021/ma060516o

Differences in the Solid-State Structures of Single-Site and Ziegler−Natta Linear Low-Density Polyethylenes As Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulation

2006· article· en· W2048426891 on OpenAlexaff
Mingzong Zhang, Fanny Yuen, Phillip Choi

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer crystallization and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear low-density polyethyleneAmorphous solidBranching (polymer chemistry)PolymerMolecular dynamicsCrystallizationInterphaseQuenching (fluorescence)Materials scienceHomogeneity (statistics)ChemistryCrystallographyThermodynamicsPolymer chemistryComposite materialComputational chemistryFluorescenceOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were carried out to study the solid-state structures of single-site (ss) and Ziegler−Natta (ZN) linear low-density polyethylenes (LLDPE) at a temperature slightly below their melting temperatures. The two bulk state models, used to represent the polymers, possessed the same average branch content (10 hexyl branches per 1000 backbone carbons) but with different degrees of interchain branch distribution homogeneity. Both models were first equilibrated at 463 K (i.e., 190 °C) for several nanoseconds, and the resultant structures, which were found to be representative of the corresponding liquid-state structures, were then used as the initial structures for the subsequent quenching process. The quenching temperature was 373 K (i.e., 100 °C), and the structures were then equilibrated at the same temperature for a period of about 10 ns. The structures of the two polymers formed after the low-temperature equilibrations were considerably different. In particular, the ZN-LLDPE model exhibited a higher amount of order, as quantified by a higher trans/gauche ratio, and a longer “stem length” than those of the ss-LLDPE model. The hexyl branches in the ss-LLDPE model distributed more or less evenly in its interphase and amorphous phase while the branches in the ZN-LLDPE model concentrated in the amorphous phase. The concentration of tie molecules in the ss-LLDPE model was significantly higher than that of ZN-LLDPE. We believe that the structures revealed by the MD simulations correspond to those formed in the early stages of the crystallization process since the models and simulation times used precluded us from modeling the complete crystallization process. However, it is also believed that these structures should resemble the chain conformations of the polymers in their solid state because the available thermal energy at 373 K was not sufficient for further significant conformational rearrangements. The results found are consistent with the experimental findings that ZN-LLDPE solids tend to have a higher degree of crystallinity than ss-LLDPE with similar or even lower average branch content and that ss-LLDPE solids possess a higher concentration of tie molecules. Our simulation results also indicated that with the presence of highly branched chains linear chains tended to crystallize faster than the chains with branches, and this is consistent with the experimental observation of Mirabella that thicker lamellae form before the thinner ones [ J . Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2001, 39, 2800].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicPolymer crystallization and propertiesFrench-language works237,207