MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048429397 · doi:10.1063/1.3554210

Multireference coupled-cluster study of the symmetry breaking in the $\rm {C_{2}B}$C2B radical

2011· article· en· W2048429397 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiangzhu Li, Josef Paldus

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCoupled clusterBasis setExcited stateSymmetry breakingAtomic physicsSymmetry (geometry)ChemistryPhysicsBasis (linear algebra)Configuration interactionMultireference configuration interactionOpen shellQuantum mechanicsMathematicsGeometryMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential energy surfaces (PESs) for both the ground and the excited electronic states of the C(2)B radical are investigated using various multireference (MR) coupled-cluster (CC) approaches. In the ground state case we employ the reduced MR (RMR) CC approach with singles (S) and doubles (D), the RMR CCSD method, as well as its RMR CCSD(T) version corrected for secondary triples, relying on various model spaces and basis sets. The reliability of this approach is also tested against the benchmark full configuration interaction results obtained for a small Dunning-Hay (DH) basis set. The results imply a clear preference for a cyclic structure which, however, breaks the C(2v) symmetry. This symmetry breaking manifests itself strongly at the level of the independent particle model, as represented by the restricted open-shell Hartree-Fock approximation, but the tendency toward symmetry breaking diminishes with the increasing size of the basis set employed as well as with the enhanced account of the correlation effects. It is likely to disappear in the complete basis set limit. The general model space CCSD method is then used to compute vertical excitation energies for a number of excited states as well as the cuts of the PES as the boron atom moves around the C(2) fragment. These results also explain why no symmetry breaking is found when relying on a spin contaminated unrestricted Hartree-Fock reference, as in the UMP2 method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207