Pratiques de l’écriture frontalière chez quelques écrivains migrants québécois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article propose, d’une part, une analyse de l’écriture frontalière/du border writing (Hicks 1991) dans l’œuvre de quelques écrivains migrants du Québec dont Dany Laferrière, Wajdi Mouawad, Abla Farhoud, Ying Chen, Régine Robin, Marco Micone et Naïm Kattan. Il s’agit d’analyser la frontière non pas sur le plan thématique, mais en tant que pratique d’écriture, c’est-à-dire de montrer comment les écrivains migrants cherchent constamment dans leurs œuvres à franchir et à repousser les frontières, quelles qu’elles soient. L’écriture frontalière est, d’autre part, observée du point de vue de ses effets de lecture, puisqu’elle incite le lecteur à développer une vision multidimensionnelle du texte et contribue à brouiller ses repères géographiques, linguistiques, culturels, etc. L’article se conclut par l’hypothèse selon laquelle le décentrement culturel et identitaire vécu par les écrivains migrants et les pressions qu’ils subissent de la part de l’institution littéraire les conduit à un recentrement sur la parole poétique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".