MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048456531 · doi:10.1049/ip-cta:20040336

Stability analysis of radial power systems: a passivity approach

2004· article· en· W2048456531 on OpenAlexaff
N. Léchevin, Pierre Sicard, Ziwen Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Control Theory and Applications · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsBC Hydro (Canada)Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassivityControl theory (sociology)Stability (learning theory)Electric power systemProperty (philosophy)Constraint (computer-aided design)Power (physics)Computer scienceComponent (thermodynamics)MathematicsEngineeringControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A passivity approach is presented that acts as a framework for the analysis of the stability of power systems and allows the derivation of controllers. A radial power system is decomposed according to the component oriented modelling technique (COMT). The whole system is thus modelled as a feedback subsystem decomposition suitable for the application of the passivity approach. Under the assumption of a passive or a passified load, L2-stability properties are obtained when disturbances occur in the network. Once disturbances are cleared an asymptotic stability property is derived. In the case of non-passivity of certain loads or series elements located in the network and when an energy-like constraint is satisfied, ultimate boundedness properties are obtained with a quasi-passivity concept.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEE Proceedings - Control Theory and ApplicationsSame topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207