Activation of protease‐activated receptor‐4 inhibits the intrinsic excitability of colonic dorsal root ganglia neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The antinociceptive mechanism underlying protease-activated receptor-4 (PAR(4)) activation was studied in Fast Blue-labelled dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons from mouse colon which expressed transcript for PAR(4). Whole cell perforated patch clamp recordings were obtained from these neurons and the effects on neuronal excitability of PAR(4) activating peptides (AP) and reverse peptides (RP) were examined. A 3-min application of PAR(4)-AP (100 micromol L(-1)) markedly suppressed the number of action potential discharged at twice rheobase for up to 60 min. PAR(4)-RP had no effect. PAR(4) application suppresses the excitatory effects of PAR(2). These findings demonstrated that activation of PAR(4) on colonic DRG neurons suppresses their excitability, suggesting these receptors could provide important targets for modifying pain in colonic GI disorders such as IBS and IBD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".