Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, a serious effort to remake the Chinese administrative system has accelerated. This article explores the dynamics of reforms aimed at improving the bureaucracy's effectiveness in providing services to the public. To illuminate key features of the process of local-level administrative reform, it examines in detail the pathbreaking Service Promise System experiment carried out in the city of Yantai. This case study shows how useful innovative ideas about reform filter into China and then diffuse across organizational and administrative boundaries. It sheds light on the role played by “entrepreneurial executives” (local bureaucrats) in promoting innovative policies and on the features of the Chinese administrative system that shape how reforms are implemented. Drawing on the New Public Management approach to administration, the Service Promise System represented a serious attempt to make the bureaucracy more customer-oriented and professional. The analysis presented in this article highlights the difficulty of achieving these aims while the Chinese Communist Party remains averse to being bound by clear rules and by public opinion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it