Homotypic and Heterotypic Serum Isotype–Specific Antibody Responses to Rotavirus Nonstructural Protein 4 and Viral Protein (VP) 4, VP6, and VP7 in Infants Who Received Selected Live Oral Rotavirus Vaccines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Homotypic and heterotypic serum isotype-specific antibody responses to rotavirus enterotoxin nonstructural protein (NSP)-4, independent neutralization antigens viral protein (VP)-4 and VP7, and group A rotavirus common antigen VP6 were analyzed by an immunocytochemistry assay in infants who received 1 of several live oral rotavirus vaccines. Significant serum immunoglobulin (Ig) A and IgG antibody responses to homotypic and/or heterotypic NSP4s of genotype [A], [B], or [C] were detected after vaccination. The magnitude of antibody responses to homotypic and heterotypic NSP4s was not significantly different, irrespective of the NSP4 genotype of the administered vaccine strain. In addition, there were no significant differences between IgA antibody responses to homotypic and heterotypic VP7s. In contrast, IgA antibody responses to VP4 were predominantly homotypic. IgA antibody responses to VP7 were lower in magnitude than those to VP4 but were comparable to those to NSP4. Antibody titers to homotypic and/or heterotypic NSP4s were positively correlated with those to VP6 before and after vaccination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".