Current sharing between the metallic and superconducting layers of high temperature superconductor coated conductors operated above their critical current
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this contribution, we report and discuss the physical meaning of pulse current measurements carried out on coated conductors (CCs) consisting of a superconducting YBCO film deposited on a Hastelloy substrate and coated with a thin metallic layer. The high current (up to 1000 A) and short duration pulses have allowed us to determine the current-voltage characteristics of two different samples in a situation near that of zero injected energy and therefore remove the bias resulting from the temperature rise during the measurement. The characteristics obtained show a flux creep region and two linear regimes. The first linear regime is the flux flow regime. In this regime, we show that there is a constant vortex velocity that depends on the metal film resistivity. The second linear regime is also a vortex regime, but its precise nature is less clear. We propose models describing both linear regimes, in agreement with the measurements. Finally, we discuss the consequences of these results for the applications of CCs in devices for power systems, especially fault current limiters and power transmission cables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".