MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048628061 · doi:10.1021/jp046848h

Solid State NMR Spectroscopic Investigations of Model Compounds for Imidazole-Based Proton Conductors

2004· article· en· W2048628061 on OpenAlexafffund
Ingrid Fischbach, H. W. Spieß, Kay Saalwächter, Gillian R. Goward

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsImidazoleChemistryProtonAnisotropyRing (chemistry)Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyCrystallographyDipoleChemical physicsSpectroscopyComputational chemistryStereochemistryOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The temperature dependence and the exact geometry of slow molecular reorientations in imidazolium methyl sulfonate are investigated using modern one-dimensional MAS exchange spectroscopy. Earlier high-temperature studies have evidenced a fast 180° flip motion of the imidazole ring, which is shown here to slow on cooling and is believed to be a prototypical molecular process involved in Grotthus-type proton transport in imidazole-based proton conductors intended for fuel cell applications. It is further shown that valuable information on the relative orientations of CH and NH dipolar coupling tensors with respect to the chemical shift anisotropy tensors of the respective heteronuclei can be obtained from the MAS exchange data as well as from static 13 C and 15 N line shapes, without the necessity of performing more involved single-crystal NMR experiments. The principal axes of the CSA tensors are found to not coincide with the CH or NH bond axes, in contrast to earlier assumptions involving similar compounds. Imidazole itself is shown to be more complex than might be expected, based on its simple structure. Implications on earlier studies of pure imidazole, where ring flips were claimed to be absent, are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207