A method for screening soybean seedlings for resistance to northern stem canker caused by <i>Diaporthe phaseolorum</i> var. <i>caulivora</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Five soybean varieties, Williams, Harosoy, AC Hime, Coles and Leo were inoculated 2 and 4 wk after planting with Diaporthe phaseolorum var. caulivora to determine if differences in resistance to stem canker could be detected in the early stages of plant development. Seedling stems were severed above the unifoliolate leaves and inoculum was applied to the cut surface. Stem lesion lengths were measured at 1, 2 and 3 wk following inoculation. The mean lesion length on seedlings inoculated 2 wk after planting (27.2 mm) was significantly less than seedlings inoculated 4 wk after planting (44.5 mm). Based on mean lesion length, Williams was the most susceptible variety followed by Harosoy. AC Hime, Coles and Leo were equally resistant. Stem canker development measured at 2 and 3 wk following inoculation was negatively correlated with stem moisture at the time of inoculation suggesting that stem moisture is important in the development and severity of stem canker. Key words: Diaporthe phaseolorum var. caulivora, Glycine max, inoculation method, northern stem canker, resistance, screening method
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".