MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048640225 · doi:10.1063/1.1288029

Sample morphology and porosity in electron stimulated desorption: N2* from N2 adsorbed onto nanoscale ice films

2000· article· en· W2048640225 on OpenAlexaff
E. Vichnevetski, A. D. Bass, Léon Sanche

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsPorosityDesorptionAmorphous solidThin filmMaterials scienceAdsorptionMetastabilityNanoscopic scaleChemical engineeringYield (engineering)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical physicsChemistryNanotechnologyCrystallographyComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have measured the electron-stimulated desorption of metastable molecular nitrogen (N2*) from N2 condensed onto solid thin films of water of varying preparation. Structures seen in the N2* yield function permit the quantity of N2 at the film–vacuum interface to be monitored and hence allow one to study changes in the effective surface area of the water film. This latter quantity is itself related to the porosity of the film. When deposited onto porous water, N2 molecules penetrate into the film and throughout its pores covering their large surface area. Under these conditions, the signal of desorbing N2* particles is inversely proportional to the surface area of the pores. We present a simple model for N2 film growth on a porous film. Its mathematical formulation allows the pore area and pore volume of amorphous water films to be measured. The surface region of crystalline water films is also found to be rough. Moreover, the porosity of solid water films is found to be dependent on the substrate on which the film is grown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.661

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207