MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048653883 · doi:10.1117/12.829743

Enhanced laser-writing techniques for bimetallic grayscale photomasks

2009· article· en· W2048653883 on OpenAlexaff
James M. Dykes, Glenn H. Chapman

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Photolithography Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrayscalePhotomaskComputer scienceLaserBimetallic stripMaterials scienceArtificial intelligenceOpticsPixelNanotechnologyMetallurgyResist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under laser exposure, bimetallic thin films of Bi/In and Sn/In oxidize becoming transparent. By controlling the power, direct-write binary and grayscale photomasks have been produced with the mask's transparency (optical density, OD), ranging between ~3.0 (unexposed) to <0.22 (fully exposed). Precise 3D micro-optics require both high vertical accuracy, gray levels over large OD changes, and precise lateral pattern creation. To achieve this result, an OD measurement system has been developed that provides real-time measurements while the masks are being written. Using stationary exposures of Bi/In and Sn/In films with varying laser powers, the reduction in OD of the films is measured with respect to time. Using 1-minute exposures, the films reach a 'saturated' level within a second at 180 mW while at 50 mW their OD gradually reduces. The influence of film's thickness is examined with thicker films requiring a longer exposure time in order to reach a similar OD level. For mask-writing, the optimal line spacing is dependent upon the laser beam's power distribution profile. Using a line-spacing 3-5 times smaller than the effective spot-size, variations in the patterned mask caused by a Gaussian-distributed beam can be minimized at the cost of increasing the writing time of the mask by the same factor. The Gaussian-distributed beam at different laser powers is also found to create shifts in the OD measurements that are problematic for a closed-loop mask-writing system. The influence of the beam's power distribution is discussed along with solutions to eliminate the problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvancements in Photolithography TechniquesFrench-language works237,207