MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Induction of murine thyroiditis by a non dominant E<sup>k</sup>‐restricted peptide of human thyroglobulin

2003· article· en· W2048658823 on OpenAlexaff
Evangelos Karras, George Carayanniotis, Peggy Lymberi

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThyroglobulinEpitopePeptideMonoclonal antibodyThyroiditisAutoimmune thyroiditisMolecular biologyBiologyT cellEndocrinologyAntibodyInternal medicineIn vivoImmunologyThyroidImmune systemBiochemistryMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have previously shown that the human thyroglobulin (hTg) 20-mer peptide p2340 (aa 2340-2359) contains an epitope recognized by Tg-reactive B cells in patients with Graves' disease. The presence of several Ek-binding motifs within p2340 prompted us to examine whether this peptide can stimulate a T-cell response and elicit experimental autoimmune thyroiditis (EAT) in AKR/J (H-2k) mice. The peptide was found to be immunogenic at the T-cell level since it induced specific proliferative responses as well as interleukin-2 and interferon-gamma secretion in secondary cultures of peptide-primed lymph node cells (LNC). The p2340-specific proliferation was blocked almost completely by an Ek-specific monoclonal antibody (mAb) but was unaffected by a control Ak-specific mAb. Peptide-primed LNC did not respond to intact hTg and conversely, LNC primed in vivo with hTg did not respond to p2340 in culture, suggesting that p2340 contains non-dominant T-cell epitope(s). Direct subcutanaeous challenge of AKR/J mice (n = 9) with p2340 in adjuvant, elicited mild to moderate EAT (infiltration index of 1-2) and strong p2340-specific immunoglobulin G responses in all mice tested. These data delineate a new thyroiditogenic sequence within the carboxyl terminal region of hTg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImmunologySame topicThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207