On the behavioural response of<i>Rana</i>and<i>Bufo</i>tadpoles to echinostomatoid cercariae: implications to synergistic factors influencing trematode infections in anurans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We used high-speed videography of staged encounters between tadpoles of either Bufo americanus Holbrook, 1836 or Rana sylvatica LeConte, 1825 and Echinostoma Rudolphi, 1809 cercariae to understand why echinostomatoid trematodes, such as species from the genera Echinostoma and Ribeiroia Travassos, 1939 (implicated in anuran limb deformities), attack specific anatomical regions of tadpoles. Bufo and Rana tadpoles can shed cercariae on their skin from some parts of their body more easily than others. In particular, cercariae that enter the "dead-water zone" at the junction of a tadpole's body and tail appear particularly difficult for tadpoles to brush off. Cercariae that reach this recess can easily enter the inguinal region of tadpoles (as do Ribeiroia spp.) or ascend the tadpole's cloaca (as do Echinostoma spp.). When tadpoles sense cercariae contacting their skin they make explosive movements to shed those parasites. Factors that reduce tadpoles' activity, such as predator threat or certain pesticides, may increase a tadpole's susceptibility to echinostomatoid infection. Because Bufo tadpoles are unpalatable to many predators, they can afford to make more conspicuous evasive maneuvers than Rana tadpoles, and do so in the laboratory. Bufo tadpoles in the field also have a lower rate and different anatomical distribution pattern of Ribeiroia infection than Rana tadpoles. Factors that reduce tadpole activity in the field may act synergistically to increase parasite loads and subsequent deformities in anurans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".