MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048679198 · doi:10.1021/ie8020126

Catalytic Conversion of Thiophene under Mild Conditions over a ZSM-5 Catalyst. A Kinetic Model

2009· article· en· W2048679198 on OpenAlexafffund
Lisette Jaimes, Hugo de Lasa

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsThiopheneBenzothiopheneFlue-gas desulfurizationCatalysisGasolineZeoliteCokeChemistryZSM-5Fluid catalytic crackingOctaneChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryThermodynamicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently, refiners consider the post-treatment of FCC gasoline processes to be a viable and likely less costly path for meeting environmental regulations on sulfur. Several promising catalytic desulfurization post-treatment processes do not require hydrogen addition and use zeolites. This type of desulfurization leads to significant levels of coke, and as a result, it is being considered for implementation in twin fluid beds (reactor and regenerator) to maintain the catalyst activity. This study evaluates the conversion of thiophene on H-ZSM-5 zeolite in a silica matrix. Experiments were carried out in the CREC fluidized riser simulator under mild conditions using thiophene/ n -octane and thiophene/1-octene mixtures. The results show a high and selective thiophene conversion. It is speculated that thiophene conversion takes place via ring opening and alkylation to form H 2 S, aromatics, alkylthiophenes, benzothiophene, and coke. These observations are in agreement with previous thermodynamic analyses. On this basis, a reaction network and kinetic model are proposed. Numerical regression leads to kinetic parameters with narrow spans, suggesting that the proposed model satisfactorily simulate thiophene removal under the suggested gasoline post-treatment conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesFrench-language works237,207