MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048696812 · doi:10.5539/jas.v6n12p152

Multivariate Statistical Analysis of the UV-Vis Profiles of Wine Polyphenolic Extracts during Vinification

2014· article· en· W2048696812 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roberta Sanna, Cristina Piras, Flaminia Cesare Marincola, Valentina Lecca, Sergio Maurichi, Paola Scano

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRegione Autonoma della Sardegna
KeywordsWinemakingFlavonolsWineChemistryPrincipal component analysisFood sciencePolyphenolAnthocyanidinAnthocyaninChromatographyMathematicsBiochemistryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multivariate Statistical data Analysis (MVA) was used to study the changes undergone by the UV-Vis spectral profiles of polyphenolic components during vinification. Two Sardinian wines, from the white cultivar “Vermentino” and from the red “Cannonau”, were studied. The wine samples were collected at different times from the fermentation vessels and the UV-Vis spectra of their solid phase extracts (SPE) were submitted to PCA (Principal Component Analysis) and to Orthogonal Projections to Latent Structures (OPLS) regression analysis in order to look for the main source of variability present in the spectra in terms of grape typology and winemaking times. In Vermentino, during the first weeks of vinification the prevalent modifications regarded the increase of the bands at 280 and 350 nm, attributed to HBA, stilbenes flavan-3-ols and glycosylated flavonols, respectively; at approximately 60 days a bathocromic shift of the band at 350 nm towards 380 nm took place, suggesting hydrolysis of flavonols. In Cannonau, the band at 536 nm, attributed to anthocyanins, that showed a consistent increase in the first days of vinification, after 11 days dropped significantly, exhibiting also a bathochromic shift. The band at 380 nm was linearly positively correlated with time. Our results support the potential use of this approach for qualitatively monitoring the winemaking process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207