MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048730706 · doi:10.1159/000027717

What Is the Earliest Non-Invasive Malignant Lesion of the Larynx?

2000· editorial· en· W2048730706 on OpenAlex
Alfio Ferlito, Claudio Doglioni, Alessandra Rinaldo, Kenneth O. Devaney

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueORL · 2000
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLarynxMedicineLesionPathologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accessible online at: www.karger.com/journals/orl Cancer of the larynx constitutes 1–2% of all malignancies diagnosed annually worldwide and represents the most common head and neck malignancy in the United States, as recently reported by the National Cancer Data Base [1]. Survival in patients with laryngeal cancer is dependent on the stage and site of tumour and its phenotype. It is obviously difficult, or even impossible, to control faradvanced laryngeal cancer, and it is therefore essential to concentrate on the initial steps in tumour development in order to facilitate early detection and timely implementation of suitable therapy [2]. Neoplastic development in laryngeal epithelium, as with many other epithelial cancers, is a multistep process driven by accumulating multiple and specific genetic alterations, involving oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes [3, 4]. The first morphologically unequivocal recognizable step is represented by intraepithelial abnormalities, such as dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. However, adjacent apparently normal squamous epithelium may already harbour the initial genetic abnormalities leading to malignant transformation. Early detection appears to be the best and only chance to improve the therapeutic results of laryngeal cancer. Therefore, it is necessary to recognize the initial intraepithelial neoplastic lesions. What is the earliest non-invasive malignant lesion of the larynx? To answer this question, it may be best to begin by explaining what early cancer is. In our practice, we use the term ‘early cancer’ to mean a very precisely defined entity, namely, a minimally invasive pathologic and biologic entity which does not invade muscular or cartilaginous structures, but which nevertheless possesses a (small but real) potential for metastasizing. Of necessity, then, such an ‘early’ cancer is confined to the lamina propria and, as noted above, can be no more than a minimally invasive lesion [5]. In terms of the surface area of mucosa it may involve in a given patient, however, early cancer of the larynx may be a surprisingly extensive lesion, giving rise on occasion to a so-called ‘carpet’ or ‘superficial extending’carcinoma. The critical distinction which we would advocate, however, calls for restriction of the use of the diagnostic term ‘early cancer’ to lesions in this ‘middle ground’: lesions which extend further than a purely intraepithelial proliferation (which, by definition, would be delimited by a basement membrane), yet less extensive than those proliferations which reach into adjacent skeletal muscle or cartilage. As such, we do not believe that early cancers are either in situ or T2/T3 lesions [5].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it