MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2048744099 · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00131.2002

Effect of NOS inhibition on central response to atrial distension during pregnancy

2002· article· en· W2048744099 on OpenAlexaff
Siu Lin Tam, Elaine Sims, Susan Kaufman

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistensionPregnancyInternal medicineMedicineCardiologyEndocrinologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atrial distension increases c-fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus of virgin, but not pregnant, rats. We proposed that nitric oxide (NO), biosynthesis of which increases during pregnancy, blunts this reflex and that blocking NO biosynthesis would restore the response. Female rats were implanted with indwelling intracardiac balloons. On day 14 of pregnancy, osmotic minipumps containing either D- or N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (120 mg/2 ml at 10 microg/min) were implanted. On day 20, the rats were infused with saline (3 ml/h) with or without atrial balloon inflation (1 h). The brains were then processed for quantitation of c-fos expression. In the virgin rats, and in the pregnant rats treated with L-NAME, atrial distension significantly increased hypothalamic c-fos expression. In the pregnant animals treated with D-NAME, the response was greatly attenuated. NO had no effect on the increase in atrial receptor afferent discharge (single-fiber recordings) elicited by atrial distension. We conclude that, during pregnancy, NO attenuates central processing of the reflex response to atrial distension but does not alter the transducer properties of the volume receptors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.450
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative PhysiologySame topicCardiovascular Issues in PregnancyFrench-language works237,207