Se gouverner sans État ni territoire ? Le cas des Acadiens du Nouveau-Brunswick
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine le processus historique de la structuration de l’organisation sociopolitique des Acadiens du Nouveau-Brunswick (Canada), une minorité nationale sans gouvernement ni territoire propre. Ne pouvant s’appuyer sur les mécanismes traditionnels de régulation politique, ce groupe minoritaire s’appuie principalement sur un réseau d’organismes et d’associations pour exercer sa gouvernance, c’est-à-dire une capacité d’agir sur lui-même. Nous tracerons l’historique de la construction et de la reconfiguration de ce réseau qui s’est amorcé vers la fin du 19e siècle. Nous discutons en quoi cette organisation sociopolitique a permis à cette minorité linguistique d’acquérir le pouvoir d’influencer les programmes politiques qui ont une incidence sur ses conditions d’existence, ainsi qu’assurer une régulation interne du groupe. Nous soutiendrons qu’il s’opère ainsi une double dynamique de structuration du pouvoir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".